Print bookPrint book

Content

1 INTRODUCTION

This manual of Standard Operating Procedures, a handbook provided to various functionaries for implementation of Aajeevika Skills Programme (ASP). The starting point of the manual is the guidelines and the related policy documents. The manual is an outcome of a number of discussions held in National Institute of Rural Development and Panchayat Raj (NIRD&PR&PR), Hyderabad and other places involving different stakeholders at various levels. In addition, consultations were also held with experts in different areas who are not part of the programme but are keen to ensure its success.

Site: eSOP Learning Portal
Course: Operations
Book: Content
Printed by: Guest user
Date: Thursday, 24 July 2025, 4:49 AM

Table of contents

1. Introduction

This manual of Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) is a handbook provided to the various functionaries for the implementation of the DDU-GKY. The starting point of the manual is the guidelines and the related policy documents. The manual is an outcome of a number of discussions held in National Institute of Rural Development and Panchayati Raj (NIRD&PR),Hyderabad and other places involving different stakeholders at various levels. In addition, consultations were also held with experts in different areas who are not part of the programme but are keen to ensure its success.

1.1. Outline of the manual of Standard Operating Procedures

Every item of work in the life cycle of a DDU-GKY project has been grouped into several modules. Every module is assigned a chapter and every item of the module has been detailed in separate sub-sections of the chapter. Most sub-sections have been divided into two tables. The first table gives the overview of the item of work and the second table details activities, actors and timelines. Most sub sections refer to several standard forms (SFs). These SFs are the instruments through which all items of work are to be undertaken and monitored. However, a few sub sections are written in the normal narrative form.  

A breakup of the contents of each chapter and its overall thrust is given in Table 1.1.

Table 11 Contents of SOP and the overall thrust of each chapter

Chapter number and title

Thrust of the chapter

1     Introduction

The chapter deals with basic introduction of the SOP, procedures to make changes in guidelines and SOP, applicability of the SOP and important timelines in a project. It also covers roles of district administration, village level organisations and panchayats, and approach to quality.

2     PIA registration and project sanction

Covers the registration procedures currently under vogue.

3     Project implementation procedures

Covers financial and non-financial aspects of a project.

4     Training design and planning

Discusses the academic planning of a project

5     Training centres

Training centres, infrastructure and due diligence of a training centre is discussed here. Checks on quality of training to be initiated are also discussed here.

6     Training initiation

Starts with mobilisation and ends with freezing of a batch and dealing with screening and aptitude test.

1.1.1     Navigation of document

As explained earlier, most sub-sections are presented in two table format; the first table is titled “Overview” and gives a basic understanding of the procedure and the second table is titled “Activities” which brings out how the work is to be completed. In addition, most sub sections have standard forms to be filled which are mentioned in appropriate locations in the tables.

The best way to use the SOP is to: 

·                Locate the sub section for the appropriate procedure from the SOP contents page

·                Go to the relevant page

·                Review the overview table in the sub section to get an understanding of the procedure and then go to the activities table.

·                Most of the overview and activities tables have a number of SFs mentioned in them.

·                All the SFs are listed and located at the end of each chapter as per sequence of appearance in the chapter. They can also be located by referring to the list of standard forms available after the contents page. SFs are assigned section numbers suffixed with A, B and so on. Thus if Section 5.1 has three forms they would be called SF 5.1A, SF 5.1B and SF 5.1C. Further, if a form has more than one sub-form they are numbered with a numeral after alphabet. For example, sub-forms under SF 5.1B are numbered as SF5.1B1, SF 5.1B2, etc.

As an example we have reproduced the overview Table and activities Table of a subsection below:

3.2: Release of 1st instalment

 

Overview

Item

Description

Purpose

To lay down the fund release process for 1st instalment and issue of Project commencement order to PIA

Reference to Guidelines

 Row 1, Instalment 1, table 6, para 5.9, page 56

Prerequisite/s                    

Uploading of executed MoU

Time for completion                  

10 working days after signing the MoU (MoU execution day is coded as I3)

Resource/s               

SF 3.2A: Project account registration form on PFMS and SF 3.2B: Project commencement order

Process owner:

For APS: SRLM

For YPS: CTSA

Activities

Actor

Action

Time for completion

Relevant Documents

PIA

1.Opening dedicated bank account[1] for the project and linking it to Public Finance Monitoring System (PFMS)

2. Filling up the bank account details if PFMS is not operational.

To be completed at least 5 days before signing of MoU (I3 - 5 days)

SF 3.2A: Project account registration form of PFMS

SRLM

(For APS)/ CTSA

(For YPS)

Release the first instalment amount of central & State shares and updating the status on designated web-link (It is mandatory central and state shares are released together This should be followed meticulously by fund releasing agencies)

latest by I3+10 days

Nil

SRLM

(For APS)/ CTSA

(For YPS)

Issue of Project commencement order

 latest by I3+10 days

SF 3.2B: Project commencement order

Note: The project commencement date of the project will be from 30 days from the date release of central and state share from CTSA for YPS/ SRLM for APS



[1] If consortium partners are going to implement any activities and any outsourcing partner is engaged in training and placement towards the project, they have to open a dedicated bank account. All the project bank account needs to be mapped into PFMS, whenever the system becomes functional.

1.2. Applicability of the SOP

This SOP will be applicable to all the DDU-GKY and Roshni projects operational in APS and YPS. Hence, the SOP delineates the procedures for APS and YPS when they are different. Similarly, processes which are common to both APS and YPS,they are stated without specifying the status of the states. It is reiterated that in all such cases where a distinction has not been made, the SOP would be applicable to all the states.

If an APS would like to amplify, modify or develop a particular set of protocols or develop its own set of protocols it can do so with prior approval of MoRD provided it is consistent with the guidelines. The state should make the revised SOP and forward a copy to MoRD and NIRD&PR. NIRD&PR will consider the proposal and forward it to MoRD with its comments for a final decision by MoRD. Till MoRD approves the changes this SOP should be adhered to. 

1.3. Changes in Guidelines and SOP

1.3.1     Version control

All changes in guidelines and SOP will be systematically tracked and monitored through a version control system. Each version will have a three digit number(like X.Y.Z) with the following meaning:

The changes in the document from previous version to the current one will be provided as per SF1.3A: Document and change history,which will be last page of the chapter. The latest document will be uploaded on the designated web-link.

1.3.2     Implementation process

PIA shall be required to adhere to DDU-GKY guidelines and the standard operating procedures (SOPs)as notified by the MoRD from time to time. These include changesin guidelines and modifications in procedures as notified by MoRD from time to time. Wherea PIA is not able to implement the project as per the revised guidelines/SOPs, it shall notify the MoRD in case of YPS and SRLM in case of APS within 10 working days of notification of revision by MoRD to initiate the process of mutual discussion as per section 4.3 (ii) of MoU, which reads as follows:

The PIA and the lead partner shall comply with all terms and conditions (generally given as annexure to the sanction order), in addition to the norms specified under DDU-GKY Guidelines, 2013 (and anyadditional requirements arising out of revision in guidelines thereto as may be mutually agreed upon).

1.4. Important events in a project and their timelines

A project is divided into two phases; inception phase and execution phase. Important events in each of the phase and the related timelines are given in the Table below. However, the times are indicative and some of the events may happen earlier or later. If events happen earlier than that indicated in the timeline then the rest of the timeline getsadjusted accordingly. However, if delays occur and times get extended remedial action as proposed elsewhere in the manual would get invoked.

An important point to note is the sequencing of inception and execution phases. While these events are shown as sequential for reckoning of timelines, it is stated that a PIA can take up execution of the project 15 working days after fulfilling the project execution readiness conditions by submitting the project execution readiness form through the system. Details of project readiness conditions and the procedure for ensuring them are dealt in the manual separately.

 

Table 1‑2 Timeline of major events

Phase

Code

Major Event

Indicative time gap between the events

Inception phase

I1

Uploading of approved EC minutes[1]

0 day

I2

Uploading of Sanction order

15working days after I1

I3

Execution of Memorandum of Understanding (MoU)

20 working days after I2

I4

Release of 1st instalment and issue of Project commencement order

10 working days after I3

I5

Submission of project execution readiness form

After I1 to a maximum of 15 working days after I4

Execution phase

E1

Commencement of project

30 calendar days after I4.

E2

Notification for release of 2nd instalment

As per prospective work schedule[2]

E3

Release of 2nd instalment

60 working days after E2

E4

Notification for release of 3rd instalment

As per prospective work schedule

E5

Release of 3rd instalment

60 working days after E4

E6

Completion of training

As per prospective work schedule

E7

Completion of placement

As per prospective work schedule but not later than 4 calendar months after E6

E8

Release of 4th instalment and official closure of the project

14 calendar months after E7

 



[1]Based on past experience it is assumed that at-least 15 working days gap will be available between release of EC minutes and issue of Sanction order. However, if the gap is less than 15 days, time for to trigger event I3 will increase correspondingly. 

[2] Prepared at the MoU stage and amended time to time as per the procedures laid out in SOP manual. 

1.5. Remedy for delay

For smooth implementation of a project it is important that all tasks are completed within the time allocated for it. Accordingly most tasks have been assigned a specific time to complete the task. This section deals with the procedures to be followed if a task is not completed within the time allocated to it. Action to be taken in case of delays is summarised as per agencies involved in the process.

1.5.1     Delay by PIA in YPS

Content of the section is deleted and shifted to Chapter 10: Procedures for handling defaults, however the section is retained to maintain the number continuity.

1.6. Action for default

Content of the section is deleted and shifted to Chapter 10: Procedures for handling defaults, however the section is retained to maintain the number continuity.

1.7. Role of District Administration

Notification would be sent to the respective SRLM by MoRD marking a copy of Sanction Order. Within 15 days of receipt of sanction order or uploading of sanction order on the website, SRLM must provide necessary information to the district authorities immediately.The District Administration headed by the District Collector plays a key role in implementation of DDU-GKY projects. In the districts where the NRLM is launched and in all APS formation of District Mission Management Unit (DMMU) is mandatory. In all other districts, where DMMU has not been constituted, the District Collector will form a DMMU by designating a key person as DMMU coordinator and nominating a team of officers to support the coordinator.For these appointments, the Collector will be guided by the instructions, if any, issued by SRLM. However, in the absence of any such instructions the Collector will act as per the local conditions.

 The District Administration and DMMU will broadly have the following 3 functions:

A.        Mobilization

B.        Placement and Tracking

C.        Capacity building for Sub district functionaries

1.8. Role of Village level organization (VLOs) formed under aajeevika & Gram Panchayat (GP)

As the mobilization procedure is based on panchayat saturation approach, the success of the programme hinges on active participation of VLOs and GPs.

The role of VLOs and GPs in implementation of DDU-GKY projects is as follows:

1.9. Approach to quality

Quality is treated as an all pervading talisman in the programme and the PIA is given the central role to ensure quality of the programme. At the PIA level, two checks are envisaged; first being the PIA operations team (OP team) who have to ensure that its members do a good quality job at all times and at all levels. This is supplemented by the PIA quality team (Q team) who will further check the quality of outcomes and report the results.The TSA/SRLM will further check the quality of the programme based on the PIA Q team checks.

SOP does not give a specific composition of a Q team. However, the works to be undertaken by Q team are indicated in various processes given in SOP and PIA should plan Q team accordingly. It is reiterated that the primary responsibility for maintaining quality is that of the PIA and its Q team. Keeping this in spirit the Q team of PIA, though it works under PIA umbrella, should be the primary watchdog to maintain the quality at all level. It should report all deficiencies in quality to the PIA management, and SRLM for APS and CTSA for YPS. The PIA management team should correct the deficiencies and send its compliance report not later than 10 days. Such a self-correcting mechanism is highly encouraged. However if it is observed that the Q team is not performing its duty properly then serious action will be taken against the PIA. Such an assessment of non-performance would become part of checks by SRLM and CTSA.

It is clarified that PIA OP team will verify and certify all the records at all times. The rest of the teams - PIA Q team, TSA and SRLM, will verify a 100% of some items/records and some items on a sample basis. Table 1.2 gives a breakup of the units to be assessed 100% and the items to be checked on a sample basis.

 

Table 1-5 List of items verified 100% and by sample

Sampling

Items

100 %

a) Project related records kept at headquarters/regional office,

Training centres, Residential centres,

b) Course curriculum and contents -

c) Verification of candidates by PIA OP team,

d) PPS payment – documentary evidence like bank transfers etc.

By sample

a) Candidate documentation,

b) Assessment of training quality through prescribed methods,

c) Watching of CCTV modules for various aspects of training quality,

d) Placement and tracking,

e) PPS payment – physical verification along with placement and tracking,

f) Incentive - career progression, one year retention, foreign placement.

The samples will be randomly generated and controlled through an automated process. Neither the CTSA/SRLM, who normally draw the samples, nor the PIA Q team will know about the samples to be checked in advance. The conclusions to be drawn from assessment of samples and action to be taken are context sensitive, and will be explained at each stage accordingly.

1.10. Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platform and interim arrangements

The proposed IT architecture for DDU-GKY will be as follows:

The central system, referred as ERP system of DDU-GKY or simply the ERP system, will be the nerve centre for monitoring projects.

1.11 CENTRAL MONITOING CENTRE (CMC)

PIAs, SRLMs and CTSAs should have a Central Monitoring Centre (CMC) at an appropriate location - their strategic/operational headquarters being usually the appropriate. It should have regular monitoring and controlling mechanism to ensure quality of project implementation such as counselling of candidates, ensuring proper documentation, quality of training delivery, equipment availability and maintenance, review of daily failure report at the centre, trainers’ assessment, candidates’ assessment and certification, timely payment of candidate’s entitlements and address candidates grievances. Further ensure timely placement, tracking and also address problems associated with candidate transition to work spots. It is suggested that the CMC should have latest facilities to monitor centrally the CCTV footages. a call centre to get feedback and monitor the project health and other central monitoring tools.

1.12 List of standard forms in Chapter 1

SF 1.3A: Document and change history

Download Power point presentation of the Chapter 1